Another word for ´history´ is: 'gender'.
Can you be a good company to yourself?
Very small is life's part in which we live truly. The greater part between birth and death is not life but merely extended time.
Suffering is present everywhere, even in the most delicious moments, particularly there!
Is it possible? The Good pacting with Evil to achieve its goals??? But perhaps all this... must be so...
Whosoever is busy fears being confronted to a wasted past, evades the present and vainly attempts to extend the future.
Seelenruhe oder Seelenschwaengerung (Ibbur)?
Creatio ex nihilo is a contradiction in the terms. The 'nihil' cannot have been radical but only relative nothingness. Since there is being, nothingness is impossible once and for all. (Mind the ambiguity of the word 'since' here).
There's always an element of mourning in our relation to the other. Check it out!
G*d does not produce or cause birth and death of animate beings, he is engaged in it.
Who are bad lovers? Terrorists, fundamentalists, bureaucrats, narrow-minded peasants, alcoholics, Heidegger, patres familiae, second generation feminists, scholastics, in short: all those who suffer from their ego.
Anything is liable to criticism. Even this.
True wisdom cannot be anything else than theosophy. However, not every theosophy is wise.
True power is the property of the powerless; that's why the 'powerful' need to suppress them.
I dislike religious self-affirmation - if it is ego-bound.
Any inspiration, be it philosophical, amorous or artistic, comes do to a struggle with, AND SO, an opposition to divine power. Art, love and philosophy are yet to be overcome.
I feel pity for those who reject the idea that woman has been created out of man's bone.
God sings in colours. Do you hear it???
Your beauty is the perfect counter venom against my inborn inclination of setting myself as absolute. Nein, Fichte, am Anfang war nicht die Tat sondern... ein Antlitz, das mich unheilbar verrueckt hat.
Contempt for others is one of the subtlest manifestations of our ego.
Your facial expression protects me from ever becoming an atheist.
Your fysiognomy provides me with an interesseloses Wohlgefallen.
Pure enjoyment and satisfaction are auto-immune: they produce the ego as their suffocating counterforce.
We are both hyperaesthetic, though in different respects. Beware of the overlap, it can produce a nuclear reaction if activated.
Show me the erogenous zones of your soul, and I will anaestesise them, if need be.
My body is a stranger to me. My neighbour. However, thou shalt love thy neighbour... Shalt!
I want a private lake and beach, all for myself and for some nice people of MY choice. No managers or bureaucrats, nor Israel-bashers, only people with a sense of humour, intelligence, loving philosophy, literature, art AND playing in the water like little children!! it must be multicultural, and all animals are welcome, esp. chicken!
We fall in love with someone who is similar to the parent with whom we have unresolved childhood issues, unaware we are seeking to resolve this childhood relationship in adulthood.
Judaism: a missed opportunity for a European Buddhism.
Concentration: contemporary irreligiosity is a result of the lack of it.
How about the specific uneasiness human beings undergo if they are deprived of business and daily distractions and fully exposed to the profound dimension beyond these?
Experience requires active repression of the evidence of memory.
The Ego attempts to domesticate the vicissitudes of nature in order to perpetuate and safeguard its original enjoyment.
The notion of ‘application’ in Gadamer testifies to a cautious return to subjectivism within an originally Heideggerian atmosphere of pre-intentionality, depriving Gadamer of adequate tools to deal with evil.
I am a finite Buddha.
There is something about ethics which is unethical itself.
In a group of golems there will always be a messianic person. Humble, unnoticed, but ... seeing.
Art history is impossible except on the basis of aesthetics.
Some people are golems, i.e. bodies without a living, amiable spirit.
They are scholars, no philosophers.
Totality cannot be thought.
Suffering is always related to the other, even if one is alone. For one cannot be alone, the other is always around.
Pure nothingness cannot be wanted anymore, even if one did. It's forever too late. Im Anfang war das Ja.
I am nostalic for a paradise that never existed. Then where did the authors of Genesis get their fantasy from?
How about the evolution of consciousness, you flat darwinists, how about the phenomenology of the spirit?
Stupid women in lovely bodies have made a wrong choice before their incarnation. The Demiurge's revenge: their eyes betray them!
Quoi du Kulturkampf, vous les nationaux-socialistes? Rendez grace à Bismarck qui vous a prepare le travail d'unification et de la Gleichschaltung.
A fundamental ambiguity in Gadamer’s conception of hermeneutics may blind him for a perception of what I shall call here for the moment, ‘evil’.
Darwin was wrong: I'm not fit for life but I am still alive.
Gadamer's hermeneutics: a supererogation of human capacities in the face of 'evil'.
vrijdag, juli 09, 2010
Abonneren op:
Reacties plaatsen (Atom)

0 reacties:
Een reactie plaatsen